About Nate Heiss
Nate Heiss is a true game design chameleon. His 25-plus year career spans from competitive Magic: The Gathering play to designing iconic cards like Goblin Guide at Wizards of the Coast. He then took those skills into the AAA video game world, working as a designer and creative director at studios like Warner Brothers and PopCap on massive mobile hits like Plants vs. Zombies Heroes. Nate and I have been geeking out about game design since we met on the Magic Pro Tour in the late 90s, and now we’re finally teaming up on Gundam Assemble, an upcoming tabletop skirmish miniatures game. In this episode, we dive deep into the differences between physical and digital design, the ethics and realities of free-to-play business models, and how to capture the elusive magic of discovery in an internet age. Nate delivers profound insights that will resonate with anyone building games or trying to navigate a creative career.
Justin’s Ah-Ha! Moments
The Shift From Player to Designer Mindset: Nate and I discuss a classic trap many pro players fall into when they start designing: trying to "beat" the players. It's easy to bring a competitive ego into R&D and focus on squashing dominant strategies to prove how smart you are. But great design isn't about winning; it's about crafting a fun experience. Once you soften that competitive edge, you realize your true goal is to empower players to make their own discoveries.
The Economics of Free-to-Play Dictate Design: We tackle the controversial topic of free-to-play games. Nate points out that companies succeeding in this space aren't necessarily making "better" games; they are mastering live service and content costs. If a studio can "turn the crank" and produce engaging content at a fraction of the cost, they gain a massive competitive advantage. It shifts the design problem from just making an great game (which is table stakes) to efficiently delivering ongoing value over time.
Roguelikes are the Modern Gold Rush: I've always wanted to recreate the feeling of opening an early Magic pack—when nobody knew the optimal strategies and everything felt like an untamed frontier. Nate brilliantly identifies that roguelikes are where this feeling lives today. By taking a core loop and exploding it into a massive, randomized possibility space on every run, roguelikes force players to adapt and experiment, capturing that communal feeling of discovery over and over again.
If you are interested in working with me directly on your project, and learning from my mistakes rather than making your own, you can join my Think Like a Game Designer: Design Lab.
Show Notes
“So anything was possible back then and nobody knew anything. And so it was kind of like the gold rush, right?” (00:08:24)
Nate and I reminisce about the early days of competitive Magic: The Gathering and how the lack of internet information created an virtually forgotten sense of discovery.
Today, games are often “solved” within weeks of release. The lesson for modern designers is to figure out mechanical ways (like roguelike systems or heavily constrained drafting) to artificially recreate that “gold rush” feeling so players can still experience the joy of uncovering something unknown.
“I think running a business or diving into the arena with a thousand other competitors, you have to be kind of crazy. It doesn’t work otherwise.” (00:23:45)
We discuss the sheer hubris required to launch a new game or company in a saturated market. Nate highlights that this “craziness” isn’t a flaw; it’s a vital feature. You need an almost irrational level of confidence to throw caution to the wind and push a project forward. Those who maintain a positive attitude and aggressively take calculated risks generally have a much higher success rate than those who get paralyzed by negativity or extreme caution.
“Those are the companies that end up succeeding more not necessarily because their game is better but because they can turn the crank more at a cheaper cost” (00:49:59)
Nate gives a stark look at the reality of free-to-play mobile games. While designers want to focus entirely on making the most fun game possible, live-service success often comes down to product management and content pipelines. If a studio can create content efficiently and cheaply, they can outlast competitors with better gameplay but higher overhead. It’s a sobering but essential lesson: your business model and your production costs are just as critical to your game’s survival as your core mechanics.
“So I think that the important thing is to get the unfun complexity out of the way.” (01:17:57)
Nate breaks down a core philosophy my company is applying to Gundam Assemble. It is easy for designers to add intricate abilities that look great on paper but ultimately just make a player’s brain hurt at the table. Good development means relentlessly stripping away mechanics that cause frustrating, feel-bad moments. When you clear out the clunky upkeep and “gotcha” mechanics, the game feels smoother and players can focus entirely on the fun combinatorics of building their teams.
You can find Think Like a Game Designer on these platforms:
